A tale of two cities
The Swans’ faith sets them apart from the paper Lions. NATHAN BURKE explains why.
ROUND 22 usually throws up some interesting results and while the outcome of the Brisbane-Sydney clash may not seem interesting on the surface it did highlight the gulf between two seemingly even teams.
On paper these sides appear close, but in reality they are poles apart.
At the start of the season I was not on my own in predicting the Lions to be contenders.
I think most supposedly learned football people tipped them to factor into the September action.
And you can’t blame them as there was some solid supporting evidence.
The Lions made the finals last season, they recruited readymade AFL players, they seemingly addressed deficiencies and they apparently loved the game plan and their coach.
But alas, a final tally of seven wins and 15 losses has them much closer to a wooden spoon than a premiership cup.
To make my pre-season predictions zero from two, I tipped the Swans to drop out of the finals race and again I was not on my own.
Unlike Brisbane the Swans didn’t appear to have addressed deficiencies. They did recruit a goalkicker, but not much else and their stars seemed to be getting a little bit long in the tooth.
But here we are in September and the Lions are recovering from mad Monday while the Swans are hosting a home final against Carlton.
So what went right for one team and so wrong for the other?
Let’s look at the Lions. Basically they gambled and it didn’t come off.
The gamble was to top up the list in an effort to take advantage of what they must have seen as a premiership window.











